Well I say we vote about the name.
WOLips -1
You see with all your work, ulrich, etc., it is much more than a
woeful port. It is a development environment that has WebObjects at
its target. The Eclipse work is very, very exciting and I think that
the communities main effort should be in helping it grow. I am almost
tempted to learn development on Eclipse myself.. but I am still
trying to master WebObjects!
- j -
On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> That thing is the limit of my skills and amount-i-care-about-it :)
> If anyone wants to donate one, go to it ...
>
> ms
>
> On Aug 22, 2006, at 12:31 PM, James Cicenia wrote:
>
>> I think we need something a bit more Aqua/Aero ... translucent
>> like, a bit surfaced.
>>
>> And..... and this is a biggie.. time to change the name.
>> WOLips just doesn't cut it.
>>
>> A sad mouth? Woe is I? just doesn't really flow proudly and
>> confidently from these lips.
>>
>> If we rename it we can also rebrand it! Make it a completely
>> Eclipse based solution.
>> It doesn't need to even have eclipse or wo in it, i.e.,
>>
>> JACKED 2.0
>>
>> Java Application Compenent KeyValue ExtendeD. LOL
>>
>> Have a very nice installer... simple apps... and all the goodness
>> of the Eclipse work.
>>
>> my two cents
>>
>> James Cicenia
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>
>>> http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/Home
>>>
>>> ms
>>>
>>> On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:49 AM, RedBugz Software wrote:
>>>
>>>> > - The icon! Where is the one from Mikes t-shirt? That looked so
>>>> > nice...
>>>> Technically that logo is derivative of both Eclipse's trademarked
>>>> logo and the EO symbol, which is quite possibly trademarked by
>>>> Apple. I don't PERSONALLY care, but I don't know how other folks
>>>> feel about it.
>>>>
>>>> ms
>>>>
>>>> I really like the Eclipse logo inside the EO shell. Judging by
>>>> other Eclipse plugins frequent use of the Eclipse logo, I'm
>>>> guessing there won't be much trouble there. Who knows about the
>>>> EO part, I'm pretty sure Apple WO folks themselves wouldn't
>>>> care, but Apple corporate/legal may have to be sticky about it
>>>> for various reasons completely unrelated to its actual use.
>>>>
>>>> Then again, I don't have any idea what the current yellow tube
>>>> squirting something WOLips logo is, so I've never connected with
>>>> it. I'm guessing it's supposed to be lipstick maybe? Or is there
>>>> some other cool or interesting history behind that logo?
>>>>
>>>> Logan
>>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Aug 22 2006 - 13:10:13 EDT