If WO looses WOBuilder because Apple doesn't use/need it themselves and
there is no (WOLips) replacement then WO looses what sets it apart from
all the other web application frameworks. Lets face it: Some of the
other frameworks are (also) great. What they don't have is a collection
of supporting tools. I think WOBuilder is the most important tool, and
it is the one thing missing from WOLips.
Have look at this thread:
http://www.nabble.com/WebObjects-open-source--tf2177391.html
I'd say they're jealous of the WO-tools.
/Anders
Mike Schrag wrote:
> There is no direct replacement right now, and I suspect that iTMS people
> don't use it, so there's probably not a big push from that group to
> create a replacement. For now, I would carry on using WOBuilder if you
> like it -- it's not going anywhere for a while. As far as mid-to-long
> term, we have been discussing some possibilities here (at mDimension),
> but I don't know what, if anything, will come of it at the moment.
>
> ms
>
> On Aug 31, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Anders Peterson wrote:
>
>> Works!
>>
>> Haven't used it much, but the Entity Modeler looks absolutely great.
>> I'm impressed!
>>
>> Now that Apple has deprecate all of its own WO tools; what will
>> replace WOBuilder? Wont they need a WOBuilder replacement for the
>> music store developers? Are you going to build that for them?
>>
>> Thanks, /Anders
>>
>> Mike Schrag wrote:
>>> Update now (to 3099) and see if that works.
>>> ms
>>> On Aug 31, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Anders Peterson wrote:
>>>> Mike Schrag wrote:
>>>>> Hmm .. oddly our build server is building, but it's not pushing the
>>>>> new builds up to the public server. Let me look into it.
>>>>
>>>> I did get a new version (2.0.0.3096) but Entity Modeler still fails
>>>> to open, and the stack trace seems to be the same.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 31, 2006, at 5:35 AM, Anders Peterson wrote:
>>>>>> Yes. One fetch spec is called "1910". /Anders
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike Schrag wrote:
>>>>>>> Do you have a fetch spec on Account whose name is a number?
>>>>>>> Grumble. I wish lots of hate on plist format and its typelessness.
>>>>>>> On Aug 30, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Anders Peterson wrote:
>>>>>>>> Mike Schrag wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There should be a root cause of that exception -- that's just
>>>>>>>>> the wrapper exception. Can you see if the full exception (with
>>>>>>>>> root cause) appears somewhere?
>>
>>
>> --http://ojalgo.org/
>>
>> Mathematics, Linear Algebra and Optimisation with Java
>
>
-- http://ojalgo.org/Mathematics, Linear Algebra and Optimisation with Java
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 09:01:16 EDT