Re: Can't open EOModeler (WOLIps version)

From: Ken Anderson (list..nderhome.com)
Date: Fri Sep 01 2006 - 10:11:21 EDT

  • Next message: David LeBer: "Re: Can't open EOModeler (WOLIps version)"

    Please, everyone is taking my comment out of context.

    My point was, WO is far greater than WOBuilder. I agree WOBuilder is
    necessary for new users, and a few seasoned users. The point was, if
    you think WO's advantage is WOBuilder, that's too bad.

    On Sep 1, 2006, at 9:57 AM, Anders Peterson wrote:

    > Ken Anderson wrote:
    >
    >> I couldn't disagree with you more. WOBuilder might be a good
    >> entry level tool, but it is hardly used by seasoned WO users. It
    >> doesn't support a lot of what you need for good presentation on
    >> the web today.
    >
    > It is a good entry level tool, and that's what none of the other
    > web application frameworks have.
    >
    > Had WOBuilder been even better than it is today, some (more) of the
    > seasoned WO users would use it.
    >
    > Once IDE:s like eclipse became good enough people actually did stop
    > using emacs.
    >
    >> More importantly, it's the architecture and EOF that sets the
    >> framework apart from others... FAR apart.
    >
    > There are many alternatives. Some of them seem ok to me.
    >
    >
    > Who is WO/WOLips for? Is it (only) for a limited and decreasing
    > group of seasoned users, or is it a platform that attracts new users?
    >
    > /Anders
    >
    >
    >> On Sep 1, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Anders Peterson wrote:
    >>> If WO looses WOBuilder because Apple doesn't use/need it
    >>> themselves and there is no (WOLips) replacement then WO looses
    >>> what sets it apart from all the other web application frameworks.
    >>> Lets face it: Some of the other frameworks are (also) great. What
    >>> they don't have is a collection of supporting tools. I think
    >>> WOBuilder is the most important tool, and it is the one thing
    >>> missing from WOLips.
    >>>
    >>> Have look at this thread:
    >>>
    >>> http://www.nabble.com/WebObjects-open-source--tf2177391.html
    >>>
    >>> I'd say they're jealous of the WO-tools.
    >>>
    >>> /Anders
    >>>
    >>> Mike Schrag wrote:
    >>>> There is no direct replacement right now, and I suspect that
    >>>> iTMS people don't use it, so there's probably not a big push
    >>>> from that group to create a replacement. For now, I would carry
    >>>> on using WOBuilder if you like it -- it's not going anywhere for
    >>>> a while. As far as mid-to-long term, we have been discussing
    >>>> some possibilities here (at mDimension), but I don't know what,
    >>>> if anything, will come of it at the moment.
    >>>> ms
    >>>> On Aug 31, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Anders Peterson wrote:
    >>>>> Works!
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Haven't used it much, but the Entity Modeler looks absolutely
    >>>>> great. I'm impressed!
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Now that Apple has deprecate all of its own WO tools; what will
    >>>>> replace WOBuilder? Wont they need a WOBuilder replacement for
    >>>>> the music store developers? Are you going to build that for them?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thanks, /Anders
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Mike Schrag wrote:
    >>>>>> Update now (to 3099) and see if that works.
    >>>>>> ms
    >>>>>> On Aug 31, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Anders Peterson wrote:
    >>>>>>> Mike Schrag wrote:
    >>>>>>>> Hmm .. oddly our build server is building, but it's not
    >>>>>>>> pushing the new builds up to the public server. Let me look
    >>>>>>>> into it.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> I did get a new version (2.0.0.3096) but Entity Modeler still
    >>>>>>> fails to open, and the stack trace seems to be the same.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Aug 31, 2006, at 5:35 AM, Anders Peterson wrote:
    >>>>>>>>> Yes. One fetch spec is called "1910". /Anders
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Mike Schrag wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>> Do you have a fetch spec on Account whose name is a
    >>>>>>>>>> number? Grumble. I wish lots of hate on plist format and
    >>>>>>>>>> its typelessness.
    >>>>>>>>>> On Aug 30, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Anders Peterson wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>> Mike Schrag wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> There should be a root cause of that exception -- that's
    >>>>>>>>>>>> just the wrapper exception. Can you see if the full
    >>>>>>>>>>>> exception (with root cause) appears somewhere?
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> --http://ojalgo.org/
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Mathematics, Linear Algebra and Optimisation with Java
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> --http://ojalgo.org/
    >>>
    >>> Mathematics, Linear Algebra and Optimisation with Java
    >
    >
    > --
    > http://ojalgo.org/
    >
    > Mathematics, Linear Algebra and Optimisation with Java



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 10:11:46 EDT