Re: dependency on jmechanic

From: Mike Schrag (mschra..dimension.com)
Date: Thu Sep 21 2006 - 20:38:21 EDT

  • Next message: Anders Peterson: "Re: dependency on jmechanic"

    I was actually going to ask the same thing ... I don't think it works
    on 3.2 either, and given that we require 3.2 now, it seems we can
    maybe remove this requirement altogether? Ulrich -- is there a
    configuration that allows jmechanic to work?

    ms

    On Sep 21, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Pierre Frisch wrote:

    > Are we still using JMechanic? It raise it head when I try to update
    > and prevents WOLips from installing.
    >
    > I have not found a way of installing JMechanic with eclipse 3.2. I
    > have searched quite a few site and this really appears to be an
    > abandoned product.
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > Pierre



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Sep 21 2006 - 20:38:28 EDT