Re: Do we really need an option to enable/disable the eogenerator? n/t

From: Ulrich Köster (ulric..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2006 - 08:01:42 EDT

  • Next message: Mike Schrag: "Re: Do we really need an option to enable/disable the eogenerator? n/t"

    We have to support my laziness. ;-) Do I have to tell people that
    they have to enable it? Again and again and again.

    Uli

    Am 11.10.2006 um 13:37 schrieb Mike Schrag:

    > Actually it would change things. If the option was removed, then
    > eogenerator would ALWAYS execute when an eomodel changes. Because
    > EOGenerating isn't always actually necessary when the model
    > changes, there are times it runs when it doesn't really have to.
    > This shouldn't break things, but you do take a performance hit as
    > it regenerates and rebuilds java files.
    >
    > Is there a problem that it needs to be removed to support?
    >
    > ms
    >
    > On Oct 11, 2006, at 4:23 AM, Ulrich Köster wrote:
    >
    >> The builder requires one or more eogen files. Without them it does
    >> nothing. Removing the option won't change anything for you.
    >>
    >> Uli
    >>
    >> Am 11.10.2006 um 10:13 schrieb Guido Neitzer:
    >>
    >>> Yes please. I have a very slow Powerbook and I don't like Eclipse /
    >>> WOLips deciding to build something not necessary when it just thinks
    >>> it's useful.
    >>>
    >>> It might be on by default, but I prefer to have the option to
    >>> disable
    >>> automatic builds as much as I can.
    >>>
    >>> cug
    >>
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Oct 11 2006 - 08:01:45 EDT