Moin Lachlan,
please add your fre to jira
http://issues.objectstyle.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10001
merci
Uli
Am 18.04.2007 um 08:25 schrieb Lachlan Deck:
> Hello all (wolips implementors especially)...
>
> Would it be possible for someone to add an option to WOLips that
> would allow /Library/WebObjects/Extensions/*.jar to be available
> from the "Add Library..." dialog. i.e., so it's similar to a JRE lib.
>
> It currently shows "WebObjects Frameworks" and "WebObjects
> Frameworks old" as options.
>
> Can we have one more option: "WebObjects Runtime".
>
> This would be ideal in that it would allow someone to check out the
> project from svn, for example, without additional instructions
> about creating a User Lib in their workspace.
>
> On 01/02/2007, at 10:51 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
>
>> On 01/02/2007, at 2:21 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
>>
>>> What about just embedding all frameworks in your new Eclipse
>>> projects, thus eliminating dependency on the deployment
>>> environment (probably with exception of /System/Library/
>>> Frameworks stuff?
>>
>> That's called a work-a-round ;-) And of course I'm quite capable
>> of doing it... but the problem is that upon deployment of new apps
>> they'll have things in the classpath (from /Library/WebObjects/
>> Extensions) not anticipated won't they...
>>
>> I'm simply putting forward a vote (for want of a better word) for
>> a 'tick this box to enable/disable' including items in /Library/
>> WebObjects/Extensions in the classpath during development as I'd
>> like to simulate the real deployment environment that I'm working
>> with (not to mention other people too).
>>
>> Is that too much to ask? :-)
>>
>> Here's my view... the tool shouldn't dictate to me what features
>> of the runtime I can and cannot have access to. Sure provide a
>> sensible default - but don't hide from me options that are really
>> available and which sometimes can be needed.
>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 30/01/2007, at 11:43 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Does /Library/Java/Extensions give you the behaviour you want
>>>>> instead of /Library/WebObjects/Extensions ?
>>>>
>>>> No, not really. This thread/request is about enabling access to
>>>> a reality of the WebObjects runtime environment - regardless of
>>>> whether there's better strategies. It's of specific importance
>>>> for deployment environments where the /Library/WebObjects/
>>>> Extensions is already in use.
>>>>
>>>> To pull everything out of there would mean having to upgrade
>>>> every single application. Not fun.
>>
>> with regards,
>> --
>>
>> Lachlan Deck
>>
>>
>>
>
> with regards,
> --
>
> Lachlan Deck
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Apr 18 2007 - 03:01:02 EDT