Am I wrong, or would using this syntax make use of Dreamweaver for
design much easier as you could make a ThirdPartyTag library that
would make WYSI-kinda-WYG layout easier. Using the standard syntax,
there is only one WO tag <webobject> with this you could tell
Dreamweaver to present a much more specific representation of the tag
in the design layout, etc.
Now, from a dividing-code-from-presentation perspective, this is a
step backwards though, right? What are the pitfalls of using this
syntax instead of the HTML/WOD combo?
Dave
On Apr 18, 2007, at 6:50 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> This is from Project Wonder ...
>
> On Apr 18, 2007, at 1:24 AM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
>
>>> e.g. <wo:WOString value="$someContent" escapeHTML="$false" />
>>
>> Good grief -- when did this happen?
>>
>> cheers.
>>
>> ___
>> Andrew Lindesay
>> www.lindesay.co.nz
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Apr 18 2007 - 09:46:42 EDT