This should move over to the wonder-disc list at this point ... I
would make a simple app that just has a Main component and remove the
complexity of the app you have now. Everything you are showing me
looks correct, which leads me to believe that you have something
wrong in your dev environment (maybe you aren't linking against the
version of the framework that you think you are, or something).
On Apr 19, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Zak Burke wrote:
> Mike Schrag wrote on 4/18/07 3:41 PM:
>> I would make sure that you're using a recent version of Wonder's
>> WOOgnl framework.
>
> I am using Wonder 3.0.0.340, and the properties dump on application
> startup tells me
>
> "ognl.helperFunctions = true"
> "ognl.inlineBindings = true "
>
> The <wo name=foo /> shortcuts work. But
>
> <wo:WOString value="String Literal" />
>
> still throws errors. Curiously, it seems like the value binding is
> being translated into a name binding, which WO then fails to find
> in the WOD file. Note the "no declaration for dynamic element (or
> component) named String Literal:" in the following stack trace:
>
> Exception while handling action named "internal" on action class
> "null" :com.webobjects.foundation.NSForwardException
> [com.webobjects.appserver._private.WODeclarationFormatException]
> <WOHTMLTemplateParser> no declaration for dynamic element (or
> component) named String Literal:
> <com.webobjects.appserver._private.WOComponentDefinition: Error
> parsing template for Component : 'file:/Volumes/disk2/home/zburke/
> workspace/cms_app/dist/cms_app.woa/Contents/Frameworks/
> ce_fw.framework/Resources/InternalGroupPage.wo/':
>
> Any other hints?
>
> zak.
>
>
>> On Apr 18, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Zak Burke wrote:
>>> Mike Schrag wrote on 4/18/07 7:50 AM:
>>>> I'm just now writing completion (as we speak) for inline binding
>>>> syntax in the new html editor.
>>>> ms
>>>> On Apr 18, 2007, at 1:16 AM, Brendan Duddridge wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> It's be great to see a toolbar of some sort in the WO component
>>>>> editor. I think a switch to generate html/separate wod code vs.
>>>>> the newer inline html/combined wod would be really nice too.
>>>>> I've started to use the inline wod code more and more.
>>>>>
>>>>> e.g. <wo:WOString value="$someContent" escapeHTML="$false" />
>>>
>>> Huh; WOOgnl bindings like this:
>>> <wo name=foo />
>>> ...
>>> foo: WOString {
>>> value = "..ackage.class@CONSTANT";
>>>
>>> work for me, but when I try something like this
>>>
>>> <wo:WOString value="$item.person.contact.address.city" />
>>>
>>> I get exceptions:
>>>
>>> Apr 18 15:26:32 i3p-cms[2003] (ERXNSLogLog4jBridge.java:41) WARN
>>> NSLog - <er.extensions.ERXDirectActionRequestHandler>: Exception
>>> while handling action named "internal" on action class
>>> "null" :com.webobjects.foundation.NSForwardException
>>> [com.webobjects.appserver._private.WOHTMLFormatException]
>>> <WOHTMLWebObjectTag cannot initialize WebObject tag <wo:WOString
>>> value="$item.person.contact.address.city" escapeHTML="$false" > .
>>> It has no NAME=... parameter:
>>> <com.webobjects.appserver._private.WOComponentDefinition: Error
>>> parsing template for Component : 'file:/Volumes/disk2/home/zburke/
>>> workspace/cms_app/dist/cms_app.woa/Contents/Frameworks/
>>> ce_fw.framework/Resources/InternalGroupPage.wo/':
>>> com.webobjects.appserver._private.WOHTMLFormatException:
>>> <WOHTMLWebObjectTag cannot initialize WebObject tag <wo:WOString
>>> value="$item.person.contact.address.city" escapeHTML="$false" > .
>>> It has no NAME=... parameter
>>>
>>> Am I missing a properties setting somewhere to turn on these
>>> short cuts? Currently I have
>>>
>>> ognl.helperFunctions=true
>>> ognl.inlineBindings=true
>>>
>>> in my Properties file.
>>>
>>> zak.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Apr 19 2007 - 10:07:34 EDT