Re: WOD Editor and methods from super classed

From: André Koppany (koppan..ackoy.de)
Date: Mon May 07 2007 - 10:36:54 EDT

  • Next message: Dov Rosenberg: "WOD Editor/ WOBuilder Bindings"

    ok. Thanks.

    Best,
    André

    Am 07.05.2007 um 16:13 schrieb Mike Schrag:

    > In the meantime, I added it to the list of "NS Collections", since
    > it sort of has that same semantic ... This means you can now
    > control it by turning off "warn if missing key on NSDictionary/
    > NSArray (which is already mislabeled, but NSSet is included too).
    > It should probably be something like "warn if missing key on
    > classes that commonly have dynamic keys".
    >
    > ms
    >
    > On May 7, 2007, at 10:04 AM, André Koppany wrote:
    >
    >> mmh.
    >>
    >> I think I have to look for option 4 and pray that "magic mike"
    >> would build in that keypath regex validation thing.
    >> With option 1 or 2 I loose to much of the power of the tools.
    >> Option 3 is not usable because we are working mainly with
    >> localized apps which have a minimum of 20 bindings for loc. in the
    >> components.
    >>
    >> Best,
    >> André
    >>
    >> Am 07.05.2007 um 15:51 schrieb Mike Schrag:
    >>
    >>>> "There is no Key 'firstName' for the keypath 'loc' in CBla...."
    >>> Oh.. right .. wait a minute. Yeah it's finding "loc" just fine,
    >>> it just has no ability to validate that keypath. You have really
    >>> just a couple options right now:
    >>>
    >>> 1) switch from "error if missing key on NSKeyValueCoding" to
    >>> "warn if missing key on NSKeyValueCoding", but you'll still get
    >>> warnings
    >>> 2) turn off both, but then you'll get what Anjo was talking about
    >>> (where you lose a lot of potential errors/warnings)
    >>> 3) add // VALID onto the end of the line that is having the
    >>> problem (which tells the validator to just ignore problems on
    >>> that line)
    >>> 4) wait for me to add support for something like custom keypath
    >>> regex validations, or however it ends up -- not sure when that
    >>> will be right now
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon May 07 2007 - 10:36:58 EDT