I have used both and have a pretty good knowledge of both. The
Wonder style just kicks the originals to death. I fully agree with
Mike, the Wonder style is just so easy and "no thinking required" to
use that we should be kind and stop inflicting the original template
on people.
Chuck
On Jun 6, 2007, at 8:09 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> Currently we have two primary templates that you can start a
> project with -- WOApplication/WOFramework and WOnder Application/
> WOnder Framework. I would like to propose that we just have one
> template set, and I propose that the one should be the WOnder style.
>
> In almost every respect it is better than the previous defaults.
> It's WAY easier for new folks to begin working on projects. You
> don't have to think about includes and excludes -- You just put
> things in the right folders and it works. Note that these
> templates really have nothing to do with Wonder, it just happens to
> be the Wonder project layout. Obviously this has zero impact on
> existing projects, only new projects going forward. At the very
> least, I believe Wonder should be the default style, but in the
> long run it's much less confusing to go ahead and scrap the
> original templates and present just the wonder versions.
>
> I have been building all of my projects with this for several
> months, and obviously Wonder itself uses them, and it really is
> painless in comparison ... With the non-Wonder templates, I always
> had to play the guessing game of wondering if resources/wsr will
> end up in the right place. With Wonder, it Just Works (TM). There
> is also the potential of being able to further integrate Wonder's
> very nice (thanks Anjo) ant build system in the future, but given
> that I mostly hate ant, I don't want to think too much about that
> part :)
>
> ms
>
>
--Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jun 06 2007 - 23:19:04 EDT