We use Wonder on one of our projects, but the other one we don't. Not
that I don't want to, but we didn't use it from the start and I think
it would be a fair bit of work to convert it. It was some work to
convert our other project, but we didn't do as much crazy stuff in
that project as we do in our other. Anyway, as long as we can still
create projects that don't rely on Wonder.
Thanks,
____________________________________________________________________
Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | brenda..lickspace.com
ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
On Jun 6, 2007, at 9:17 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> I'm thinking a preference setting "Use Project Wonder" which would
> enable that behavior, off by default.
>
> ms
>
> On Jun 6, 2007, at 11:15 PM, David LeBer wrote:
>
>> On 6-Jun-07, at 11:09 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>
>>> Currently we have two primary templates that you can start a
>>> project with -- WOApplication/WOFramework and WOnder Application/
>>> WOnder Framework. I would like to propose that we just have one
>>> template set, and I propose that the one should be the WOnder style.
>>>
>>> In almost every respect it is better than the previous defaults.
>>> It's WAY easier for new folks to begin working on projects. You
>>> don't have to think about includes and excludes -- You just put
>>> things in the right folders and it works. Note that these
>>> templates really have nothing to do with Wonder, it just happens
>>> to be the Wonder project layout. Obviously this has zero impact
>>> on existing projects, only new projects going forward. At the
>>> very least, I believe Wonder should be the default style, but in
>>> the long run it's much less confusing to go ahead and scrap the
>>> original templates and present just the wonder versions.
>>>
>>> I have been building all of my projects with this for several
>>> months, and obviously Wonder itself uses them, and it really is
>>> painless in comparison ... With the non-Wonder templates, I
>>> always had to play the guessing game of wondering if resources/
>>> wsr will end up in the right place. With Wonder, it Just Works
>>> (TM). There is also the potential of being able to further
>>> integrate Wonder's very nice (thanks Anjo) ant build system in
>>> the future, but given that I mostly hate ant, I don't want to
>>> think too much about that part :)
>>
>> I've been using the Wonder templates for a while as well.
>>
>> I wouldn't miss the old ones if they went away.
>>
>> The Wonder templates set Application and Session to extend ERX*
>> right? Would that impact anyone negatively?
>>
>> --
>> ;david
>>
>> --
>> David LeBer
>> Codeferous Software
>> 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing'
>> site: http://codeferous.com
>> blog: http://davidleber.net
>> profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber
>> --
>> Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group:
>> http://tacow.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jun 06 2007 - 23:37:19 EDT