As a newbie, I totally agree. I went for stable, and it made my life
more difficult.
On Jun 21, 2007, at 3:41 PM, Steven Mark McCraw wrote:
> I think maybe all reverences to "stable" should go away. It tricks
> newcomers (guilty myself a few months back) into thinking that's
> the safest one to get. "Nightly build" sounds very risky compared
> to "stable". Who in their right mind would jump into "nightly
> build" when there's "stable" around? Maybe the drama kids.
>
>
> On Jun 21, 2007, at 6:34 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 21, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>
>>> These instructions need a good old fashion refresh ... If you're
>>> installing from the "nightly" build server, you don't need
>>> anything from Callisto, so you can totally ignore that part,
>>> which might solve your problems. If you're building from the
>>> "stable" build server, then you still need that. But no cool kid
>>> uses that build.
>>
>> I think even the shy, introverted, geeky kids are not using that
>> anymore.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
>> overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve
>> specific problems.
>> http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Joshua Archer
Software Engineer, CSU - Center for Distributed Learning
Phone: 707.664.2085, Fax: 707.664.4350
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jun 21 2007 - 18:57:44 EDT