NORMALLY that's true, but the move from 3.2 to 3.3 is pretty big.
Just know that it's "Use At Your Own Risk". I've been running on 3.3
since Ulrich committed his fixes and it's been good so far. There
are a bunch of misc 3.3 enhancements that I really like.
ms
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Jeremy Matthews wrote:
> ...but I thought mike said that the cool kids don't use the stable
> builds!
>
> -j
>
> On Jun 29, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> Testing is still in progress. Eclipse 3.3 and the nightly WOLips
>> should be regarded as unstable until an official announcement is
>> made.
>>
>> Use at your own risk.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>> On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Jeremy Matthews wrote:
>>
>>> I chose the "Classic" one...seems to work fine...anyone else?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> j
>>>
>>> On Jun 29, 2007, at 11:51 AM, Johan Henselmans wrote:
>>>
>>>> Eclipse 3.3 is officially out.
>>>>
>>>> See:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/
>>>>
>>>> However, there are five options:
>>>> 1-Java Developers
>>>> 2-Java EE Developers
>>>> 3-C/C++ Developers
>>>> 4-RCP/Plugin Developers
>>>> 5-Eclipse Classic
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can imagine that the WOLips developers would choose no 4. But
>>>> which one should a WebObjects developer choose?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Johan Henselmans
>>>> http://www.netsense.nl
>>>> Tel: +31-20-6267538
>>>> Fax: +31-20-6273852
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
>> overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve
>> specific problems.
>> http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jun 29 2007 - 14:51:06 EDT