I have never found a way to do this. It is one of the rare things in
Eclipse that are not configurable.
Chuck
On Jul 3, 2007, at 3:47 AM, Tobias Crawley wrote:
> Does Eclipse 3.3 support changing the default signature for getters/
> setters? I much prefer the WO Way [ varname()/setVarname() ] vs.
> the Java Way. I know it is not possible with 3.2, or else Mike
> would have done it already.
>
> Tobias
>
> On Jul 3, 2007, at 3:21 AM, Ian Joyner wrote:
>
>> Anyway, a project with private and protected fields and lots of
>> errors in the .wod files will still run OK. If you consider that
>> the .wod spec is tightly bound to the class, you are not really
>> breaking encapsulation, because you might still want to hide those
>> fields from other classes. Thus fix from Mike will be appreciated
>> – I don't like ignoring errors because there might be a real one
>> in there. (So much for '()' breaking encapsulation and exposing
>> implementation!)
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> On 03/07/2007, at 10:47 AM, Ian Joyner wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/07/2007, at 10:19 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well, if you fix it, please do it _after_ you write the new
>>>> WOBuilder. ;)
>>>
>>> Nah, let him fix it now ;-) Just think if C-based languages
>>> didn't have that wacky '()' function call syntax, you wouldn't
>>> need getters at all!
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 2, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's a wolips bug for a particular case that eclipse people
>>>>> don't tend to run into, but wobuilder people do because wob
>>>>> generated kind of crappy java. I was not planning on fixing it,
>>>>> but I think I may just because it's only going to become more
>>>>> common as more people make the jump.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 2, 2007, at 6:22 PM, David Avendasora
>>>>> <webobject..vendasora.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, believe me, I don't want to change them to public, I'm
>>>>>> just trying to figure out why Eclipse (WOLips?) is complaining
>>>>>> about them being protected, when WOBuilder never did. I didn't
>>>>>> know if there was some configuration within Eclipse/WoLips
>>>>>> that would tell it that it was okay and not an error, or if I
>>>>>> had somehow set it up incorrectly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But it sounds like what is being said is that to make it (the
>>>>>> error flag) go away, you have to add public getters and
>>>>>> setters, right? I know it's easy in Eclipse, just wondering if
>>>>>> that's the right route.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 2, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Janine Sisk wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 2, 2007, at 2:35 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The problem I'm running into is that almost all the
>>>>>>>> attributes that
>>>>>>>> were setup in WOBuilder are "protected", and now Eclipse is
>>>>>>>> reporting
>>>>>>>> that the attributes don't exist. If I mark them as "public"
>>>>>>>> then the
>>>>>>>> problem goes away.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is the proper way to handle this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm feeling an urge to channel Chuck....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He has taught me, forcefully :), that the right thing to do
>>>>>>> is to leave these protected and write getter and setter
>>>>>>> methods for them. Yes, it's kind of a pain. But he says
>>>>>>> that this protects you in the future; if you end up actually
>>>>>>> needing to use an accessor method then you can just modify
>>>>>>> the one that's already there instead of trying to track down
>>>>>>> all the places you accessed the variable directly. It's also
>>>>>>> better if you need to subclass in the future, I imagine for
>>>>>>> the same reason.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's not quite as much work as it sounds; if your variable
>>>>>>> is named foo, and your getter and setter are foo() and setFoo
>>>>>>> () respectively, WO will find and use them automatically. So
>>>>>>> you don't have to change your bindings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> janine
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---
> Tobias Crawley
> tobia..luecollarsoftware.com
>
>
>
--Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Jul 03 2007 - 11:20:59 EDT