Re: Apple WebObjects issue with JApplication plugin 2.0.6

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Sat Jul 07 2007 - 11:53:34 EDT

  • Next message: D Tim Cummings (JIRA): "[OS-JIRA] Created: (WOL-533) Save nightly builds as .zip rather than tar.gz so that eclipse can use [New Archived Site...] button."

    Don't know yet. I may try switching Cayenne to 2.0.7 soon and see how
    it goes.

    Andrus

    On Jul 7, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Ulrich Köster wrote:

    > Andrus,
    >
    > is it still an issue?
    >
    > uli
    > Am 03.07.2007 um 09:33 schrieb Andrus Adamchik:
    >
    >> Glad to know that somebody besides Cayenne project is using
    >> JApplication :-)
    >>
    >> Anyways, looks like some restructuring of the dependency stack
    >> would be beneficial... JApplication has no real dependencies on
    >> any of the WO frameworks (and shouldn't require bootstrapping them
    >> in the repo). But due to the way I structured things initially,
    >> every now and then Maven starts thinking it does have such a
    >> dependency. ....
    >>
    >> Andrus
    >>
    >>
    >> On Jul 3, 2007, at 9:43 AM, Ulrich Köster wrote:
    >>
    >>> Just deployed a new 2.0.7 snapshot. Please verify.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> uli
    >>>
    >>> Am 03.07.2007 um 05:27 schrieb Pseudo Nym:
    >>>
    >>>> With the recent release of the JApplication plugin 2.0.6, my maven
    >>>> builds get the following error, which they don't get under 2.0.5:
    >>>>
    >>>> No versions are present in the repository for the artifact with
    >>>> a range [5.2,)
    >>>> com.apple.webobjects:JavaFoundation:jar:null
    >>>>
    >>>> from the specified remote repositories:
    >>>> ( ...
    >>>> list of repositories
    >>>> ...)
    >>>>
    >>>> I'm not exactly a Maven guru, so I can only guess, but it looks
    >>>> like
    >>>> for whatever reason it can no longer find the artifact, or the
    >>>> artifact wasn't necessary in 2.0.5.
    >>>>
    >>>> Would somebody be able to point me in the direction of
    >>>> determining the
    >>>> cause and/or solution to this issue? I would much appreciate it.
    >>>>
    >>>> Thanks.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Jul 07 2007 - 11:54:16 EDT