Next message: Mike Schrag: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Previous message: Chuck Hill: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- In reply to: Chuck Hill: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Next in thread: David Avendasora: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Next in thread: Mike Schrag: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Next in thread: Steven Mark McCraw: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On 16.08.2007, at 11:23, Chuck Hill wrote:
> I could probably accept this provided they are not used in sub-
> classes. My concern is that what you use with caution and reason,
> someone else will abuse horribly.
Sure, and he might have fun with it ... You know, preferences are
different. ;-)
cug
- Next message: Mike Schrag: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Previous message: Chuck Hill: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- In reply to: Chuck Hill: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Next in thread: David Avendasora: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Next in thread: Mike Schrag: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Next in thread: Steven Mark McCraw: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0
: Thu Aug 16 2007 - 13:29:00 EDT