Well, I don't know that THEY would call it alpha quality, but I say
it is :) If you to use 3.3, I would recommend downloading a 3.3
Stream Maintenance Build (these builds are the ones that will become
3.3.1): http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/
The release called "3.3" is 3.3.0, and will never change, so 3.3.0
will NEVER be usable -- it is what it is. What's shaping up as 3.3.1
is better (not great, but better).
ms
On Sep 29, 2007, at 12:44 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Thanks for confirming my suspicion. Love the Eclipse site - the
> main download page only shows 3.3 release, conveniently forgetting
> to mention that it is alpha quality.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Sep 29, 2007, at 7:35 PM, David LeBer wrote:
>> On 29-Sep-07, at 12:17 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>> I've been using Eclipse 3.2 for ages now. Today I tried switching
>>> to 3.3 (the Europa J2EE flavor). It seems to be rather flaky,
>>> often freezing, crashing, running out of memory, etc.
>>>
>>> Wonder if anybody uses 3.3 on Mac at all? Is it simply not ready
>>> for prime-time, and I should stick with 3.2?
>>
>> I'm sure that Mike and the others can weigh in on this with more
>> detail but I believe the consensus is that, yes, 3.3 is not ready
>> for general use (unless you are using late development builds and
>> then only if you are willing to put up with the uncertainty that
>> that entails). I for one am not willing to go there yet.
>>
>> ;david
>>
>> --
>> David LeBer
>> Codeferous Software
>> 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing'
>> site: http://codeferous.com
>> blog: http://davidleber.net
>> profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber
>> --
>> Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group:
>> http://tacow.org
>>
>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Sep 29 2007 - 15:52:51 EDT