I've never argued against the concept of WOBuilder. I've said that I
think the implementation is pretty useless for modern CSS-based site
design (which makes sense given the year WOB was written). I've also
said that even duplicating what it does NOW is nontrivial and a
substantial investment of time. That nobody has written a suitable
replacement yet should tell us something more than people asking for
one does :)
ms
On Oct 4, 2007, at 9:53 PM, Jeremy Matthews wrote:
> Funny how we keep looking for a WOBuilder replacement...even if
> just a pseudo-inline viewer and not an editor.
>
> That alone should really tell us something....
>
> -j
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Oct 04 2007 - 23:18:07 EDT