I second that.
Pierre
On Nov 5, 2007, at 15:43, Mike Schrag wrote:
> I assumed those read PB.proj files. The makefiles don't get
> rewritten, so they must be out of date ... Regardless, I vote "let
> those tools die". I don't want to lug around a bunch of cruft for
> everyone's new projects to support tools that should have been dead
> long ago :)
>
> ms
>
> On Nov 5, 2007, at 6:35 PM, Daryl Lee wrote:
>
>> Do people using 5.2 PB Tools Windows care about the Makefile
>> stuff? That's the only reason I hesitated from pulling them.
>>
>>
>> On Nov 5, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>
>>> I would kill Makefile*, too ... I don't see any real use for
>>> this. I'm not sure if CustomInfo.plist is used by anything either.
>>>
>>> ms
>>> On Nov 5, 2007, at 6:06 PM, dle..bjectstyle.org wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> templateEngine.addTemplate(new TemplateDefinition(rootTemplate
>>>> +"/Makefile.postamble.vm", path, "Makefile.postamble",
>>>> "Makefile.postamble"));
>>>> templateEngine.addTemplate(new TemplateDefinition(rootTemplate
>>>> +"/Makefile.preamble.vm", path, "Makefile.preamble",
>>>> "Makefile.preamble"));
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Nov 06 2007 - 10:55:33 EST