> I vote for Mike's version too because I know it will be the best,
> will be properly integrated, it won't suck, and bugs will not linger
> forever.
I wouldn't go THAT far :) I think it's great that Apple wrote
JavaEOGenerator, and theirs does have better coverage of the
EOGenerator featureset as well as real EOF behind it (though honestly,
I don't think you'll even be able to tell the difference). I just
happen to prefer the other syntax, but JavaEOGen is open source, and
if people like the WO syntax they can submit patches, etc. Bugs will
only linger as long as people allow them to -- it's not up to Apple,
necessarily. Without better integration, though, I think Velocity
wins out at this point. Because it's just built in, and we had
already worked through the issues of using Velocity inside of plugins
for wizards, etc, I think the end-user experience is a little nicer.
If someone/Apple can figure out a better way to launch the WO one such
that we can package it inside of WOLips, it becomes a much stronger
contender.
ms
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Nov 15 2007 - 17:50:09 EST