Re: Issue with Binding validation

From: Mike Schrag (mschra..dimension.com)
Date: Wed Jan 02 2008 - 15:56:50 EST

  • Next message: Pierce T. Wetter III: "Re: Issue with Binding validation"

    Can you log a bug for these?

    On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:18 PM, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:

    >
    > So I have a bunch of wod files where the validator kvetches about
    > valid keys.
    >
    > That's the key I'm binding to, not the value I'm binding.
    >
    > Example:
    >
    > xmlns:m = "http://paceap.com/soap/";
    >
    > or
    >
    > transactions..ountTunnel =
    > "AdminTransactionSummary;encryptedPrimaryKey;assetID";
    >
    > Now the validator lets you put regexes in there for valid _values_
    > but not valid keys.
    >
    > Similarly, you can put // VALID on a case by case basis.
    >
    > But those are for _values_, not keys.
    >
    > So I was wondering if the //VALID tweak could be applied to both
    > sides, and/or have the validator rules apply to both sides?
    >
    > Pierce



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jan 02 2008 - 15:57:43 EST