Ah. Version Control System. Yeah, gotta get me one of those. :)
Dave
On Jan 28, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> No, there's no conversion in the manual sense, but there's
> conversion in the workflow sense. If you look at your version
> control system, going from EOModeler to Entity Modeler makes it
> appear that every line of your model files changed. This patch
> makes that a much smoother process when you convert your workflow
> over to Entity Modeler.
>
> ms
>
> On Jan 28, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
>
>> You must be using an EntityModeler after the switch back to single
>> line plist format.
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2008, at 9:28 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
>>
>>> Conversion? Was my model just too simple, or did I miss
>>> something, because when I switched from EOModeler to Entity
>>> Modeler, I didn't "convert" anything, it just worked.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> On Jan 27, 2008, at 7:50 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Personally, while the diffing is incredibly useful, I was very
>>>> pleased to see it using the single line format for now, since it
>>>> was much less traumatic for my conversion...
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 27, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> And what was written as:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> primaryKeyAttributes = (
>>>>>>> eoid
>>>>>>> );
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is now being written as:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> primaryKeyAttributes = (eoid);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I feel this is a change to the worse, as the previous format
>>>>>> allowed for easy diffing. So, before committing all those
>>>>>> changes, I thought I'd ask. :-)
>>>>> This "new" format is actually now consistent with EOModeler's
>>>>> format. This patch was from the iTunes folks and it basically
>>>>> makes it much less traumatic to convert from EOModeler to
>>>>> Entity Modeler because it won't completely change your model
>>>>> files when you switch. I agree it makes it a little harder to
>>>>> diff, but Eclipse should highlight subsections of the line that
>>>>> are different, so you should still be able to see the diffs
>>>>> without too much pain.
>>>>>
>>>>> ms
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jan 28 2008 - 11:34:42 EST