Re: superunstable

From: Lachlan Deck (lachlan.dec..mail.com)
Date: Tue Jan 29 2008 - 16:34:13 EST

  • Next message: Ian Joyner: "Re: superunstable"

    On 30/01/2008, at 5:29 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:

    >> I think I agree with David on this. Though I'd vote to add a
    >> 'Legacy' for the current 4118 build and make a snapshot before the
    >> class-path changes for the 'Release'
    >>
    >> It'd be really nice if the labels for the build actually mean
    >> something rather than 'stable' == 'old and untouched', 'nightly'
    >> == 'use this one if you want bug fixes and new features'.
    > The intent is that this is a relatively short term thing. Once
    > this classpath stuff is stable, "stable" turns into this build,
    > nightly goes back to being "unstable" and this new thing goes away
    > complete. I can't rename the existing locations because people have
    > update sites pointing to them and it will only cause MORE
    > confusion. The intent here is that if you don't know any better,
    > you continue to point to the update site you've been pointing to
    > and nothing changes for you (you just top getting updates).

    Sure -- but until the next improvement comes along where you'll be
    back here again :-)

    David's suggestion sounds like a reasonable long-term approach.

    But whatever works...

    with regards,

    --
    

    Lachlan Deck



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Jan 29 2008 - 16:35:16 EST