Re: superunstable

From: Ian Joyner (ian.joyne..portstec.com)
Date: Wed Jan 30 2008 - 00:03:28 EST

  • Next message: Ian Joyner: "Re: superunstable"

    On 30/01/2008, at 3:11 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:

    >> I'm not keeping up with nightly builds, but I have a build that is
    >> post 4118 for 3.3.2 that seems to be stable for what I'm doing. It
    >> would be nice to have a stable build for 3.3.2, but I can probably
    >> wait a month or so for that so you guys can get on with it. Maybe
    >> when the real release of 3.3.2 is out.
    > I don't see a stable build for 3.3.2 happening until this code is
    > worked through. The #1 instability in 3.3.2 is classpath management
    > related, and I have a hard time investing any time in the existing
    > code knowing that it's going away, but if there are specific things
    > that are broken that aren't huge time sinks, they might be worth
    > knocking out first.

    Understand completely. Must be like nailing jelly to the ceiling and
    not worth your time on it until the Eclipse folks make a final
    release, but according to the plan:

    http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/development/freeze_plan_3_3_2.php

    shouldn't be too far off. It's rather concerning that it still seems
    unstable in the classpath area at this late stage.

    Ian



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jan 30 2008 - 00:04:36 EST