Re: superunstable

From: Pascal Robert (prober..s.ca)
Date: Mon Feb 11 2008 - 09:18:13 EST

  • Next message: Mike Schrag: "Re: superunstable"

    Le 08-02-11 à 08:24, Mike Schrag a écrit :

    >> Any news on that topic? Can't wait...
    >>
    >> I'm still stuck with 4606, as I could not get my projects working
    >> reliably with the changes to classpath handling in 4607 (there is
    >> already a unique instance of bundle "bla"...). After hours and
    >> hours of fiddling I finally gave up. Now the upcoming
    >> "superunstable" change could bring back the fun... :)
    >>
    >> Timo
    > I'm sort of in a holding pattern and having second thoughts ... If
    > I commit, I also commit myself to a lot of work, because the ant
    > build portion is most likely going to break in a lot of funky cases
    > (who knows what people do in those ant files). I don't know if I
    > want to deal with it right now, so I'm just putting it off. I'm
    > thinking about just fixing a couple of the notable regressions in
    > the current one -- the double selection of local + system
    > frameworks, the P/Whatever error during conversion, and the unique
    > framework bug -- which incidentally only doesn't happen to me
    > because I have a custom NSBundle that works around that problem.

    If you can fix those inside the current branch, I think it will solve
    most problems that people are currently having.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Feb 11 2008 - 09:19:14 EST