On 12/02/2008, at 4:19 AM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
> On 11.02.2008, at 06:24, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>> I'm sort of in a holding pattern and having second thoughts ... If
>> I commit, I also commit myself to a lot of work, because the ant
>> build portion is most likely going to break in a lot of funky
>> cases (who knows what people do in those ant files). I don't know
>> if I want to deal with it right now, so I'm just putting it off.
>> I'm thinking about just fixing a couple of the notable regressions
>> in the current one -- the double selection of local + system
>> frameworks, the P/Whatever error during conversion, and the unique
>> framework bug -- which incidentally only doesn't happen to me
>> because I have a custom NSBundle that works around that problem.
>
> I like the idea of fixing these before going to completely new
> problems. Because the ones you mentioned are annoying (I stumble
> over them a lot at the moment, because I have to make so many
> changes here and there).
+1
Yeah, and this can be aimed at a new stable soon enough. I am keen
for the shake-up, but this seems like a sensible move prior to that.
with regards,
--Lachlan Deck
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Feb 11 2008 - 14:34:30 EST