Re: superunstable

From: Archibal Singleton (concierg..xidia.com)
Date: Tue Feb 12 2008 - 06:16:48 EST

  • Next message: David Avendasora: "Re: WOLips binding keypath validator"

    On 12 Feb 2008, at 01:56, Mike Schrag wrote:

    [snip]

    > OK ... Here's what I'm proposing -- Comments welcome:
    >
    > Already done:
    > * I just saved out patches for all my previous changes and I'm now
    > rolled back to the current unstable trunk
    >
    > Proposal:
    > * Fix these handful of regressions that showed up in 3.3 (listed
    > above)
    > * 3.3.2 is supposed to be out by the end of Feb, at which point we
    > declare the unstable branch "stable"
    > * Once we are declare stable on 3.3.2, I will modify my original
    > classpath management code to use the CURRENT ant build system but
    > with the NEW eclipse classpath management (= ant.* stays around, but
    > management is much nicer and more fine-grain within Eclipse) and
    > I'll commit that
    > * After the inside-eclipse classpath system is tested and approved,
    > that will move to the "stable"
    > * After that moves to stable, the new ant build changes will go in
    > * After the new ant build changes are stabilized, it will go to
    > "stable"
    > * After that, possibly a bug bash? Vote for your most hated bugs,
    > etc. I'd also really like to clean up the "zero state" of WO
    > development -- smoothing the process for people just starting with
    > WO development (I think this ultimately will help everyone by
    > tightening the UI) -- if you have specific ideas for this, log them.
    > * Back to new stuff?

    +1

    = tmk =



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Feb 12 2008 - 06:18:03 EST