I agree. Jar frameworks are something that looks really good at
first glance but which are not so handy in practice.
Chuck
On Feb 21, 2008, at 1:12 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> I like the easier deployment ... I have symlinks from the web
> server to the various WebServerResources inside the bundle, and I
> like that I can just untar into the Applications folder and
> everything is updated. It's also handy that it's a lot easier to
> fix something quickly if you need to (admittedly poor release
> management there, but it happens). With jar frameworks, you have
> to deal with split install every time. With bundles, you really
> don't other than the initial setup.
>
> ms
>
> On Feb 21, 2008, at 3:45 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
>
>> Hello Mike;
>>
>> I'm interested in why you'd prefer bundles to jar packaging?
>>
>> cheers.
>>
>>> This is recommended, not required (so far) by Apple. I am not a
>>> fan of jar frameworks, and will continue to use framework
>>> bundles. As a result, anything I work on in WOLips will support
>>> framework bundles first-and-foremost.
>>
>> ___
>> Andrew Lindesay
>> technology : www.lindesay.co.nz
>> business : www.silvereye.co.nz
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 21 2008 - 16:16:30 EST