>> I'm not sure how they determine which ones are actions compared to
>> just regular "get" methods. No way they looked at the inheritance
>> hierarchy to only show methods that extend from WOActionResults
>> (and even though we can do that easily, it's really expensive to
>> actually do that).
>
> I'd be guessing they did.
Should be relatively straightforward to test ... Subclass WOComponent
as CommonComponent (but don't make a .wo), and have an action method
that declares its type signature as returning CommonComponent.
There's no .wo to match it against, so WO would have to walk the
inheritance tree to know that's a WOActionResults. It's mostly
academic, but I am a little curious. If anyone has a WOB around and
wants to try this to see, I'd be interested to know the results.
ms
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Feb 27 2008 - 17:06:04 EST