Yep. I've recently been using subversive (was using Subclipse before).
A few things I've noticed
- less buggy
- some nicer options + some nicer gui stuff
- remembers stuff I typed into the commit message if I cancel and come
back or even the next time -- if I need to make a similar comment. Nice.
But, team sets, for example, still rely on subclipse. Not a big loss
for me at this stage.
Also, for maven people, I've been trying out Q4E (http://code.google.com/p/q4e/
- proposed as a project for the Eclipse foundation). Not bad.
On 03/04/2008, at 6:44 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> Subversive is going to become the official Eclipse SVN plugin, so
> that, to me, means the decision is made: http://www.eclipse.org/subversive/
>
> On Apr 2, 2008, at 2:14 PM, David LeBer wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have strong feelings about which SVN plugin for Eclipse/
>> WOLips is better?
>>
>> I tried Subclipse a while back and wasn't happy with my experience
>> (though that may speak more to my lack of experience with it than
>> with the plugin itself).
>>
>> I read that Subversive was picked up to become the default SVN
>> plugin in Eclipse at some point in the future.
with regards,
--Lachlan Deck
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Apr 02 2008 - 16:40:38 EDT