On Jul 10, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
> On 11/07/2008, at 3:50 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> On Jul 9, 2008, at 8:41 PM, Henrique Prange wrote:
>>
>>>> The rest of the patternsets are also not an Ant issue, but a
>>>> design philosophy in woproject (to not force a project layout).
>>>
>>> Maven don't force a directory layout also.
>>
>> My point was that using either Maven or woproject, if you want a
>> flexible layout you need to do more work. If you can accept a set
>> layout, your life is easier. It is not an Ant vs Maven issue as
>> Pierce was suggesting.
>
> Right. It's another alternative.
>
> I don't know if Pierce's intention was to create a this vs that
> thing in general... more of a 'what works for him' thing which he
> thought he'd share. Obviously, assuming this assumption is correct,
> this was taken instead as an early jab given Mike's on the verge of
> dropping the classpath <boom> ;-)
Yeah, that was my intention, I dislike Ant, but like WOProject, and
wish Ant worked like WOProject. I do some stuff in the GUI, and I'm
done. If Mike is making WOProject work more that way, coolness!
Pierce
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jul 10 2008 - 19:48:17 EDT