Re: ClassPath Order (NewHotness)

From: David Avendasora (webobject..vendasora.com)
Date: Tue Sep 09 2008 - 08:06:55 EDT

Next message: Kieran Kelleher: "Framework build.xml failing (New Hotness)"

Previous message: Guillaume Polet: "Re: Hotness library location on Windows"
In reply to: Kieran Kelleher: "Re: ClassPath Order (NewHotness)"
Next in thread: Mike Schrag: "Re: ClassPath Order (NewHotness)"
Reply: Mike Schrag: "Re: ClassPath Order (NewHotness)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sep 8, 2008, at 11:55 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:

> It definitely might be worthwhile to always push ERExtensions to the
> top of the classpath stack since that is where the patches and class
> substutions are.

Well, unless you have a framework that is patching ERExtensions ...
Which is something I'm doing - and having problems with getting to
load correctly when deploying to a servlet (see other thread). Ahg.

But moving it to the top of the Wonder Frameworks stack, that would be
great.

Dave

Next message: Kieran Kelleher: "Framework build.xml failing (New Hotness)"
Previous message: Guillaume Polet: "Re: Hotness library location on Windows"
In reply to: Kieran Kelleher: "Re: ClassPath Order (NewHotness)"
Next in thread: Mike Schrag: "Re: ClassPath Order (NewHotness)"
Reply: Mike Schrag: "Re: ClassPath Order (NewHotness)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 09 2008 - 08:06:17 EDT