Okay, looks like there's some kind of consensus with these few replies
for woproject-dev.
However, it does seem that it's mostly for keeping informed about
what's happening. So are there any objections to us setting up womaven-
dev anyway (rather than relying on subject prefixes) and having all
messages cc'd to woproject-dev to fulfil that interest?
On 23/09/2008, at 7:26 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
> On 23/09/2008, at 1:00 AM, Q wrote:
>
>> I think this list is fine. While I may have no immediate plans to
>> use maven, I am still interested in hearing what's going on with it.
>
> My only thinking was that this list seems, for the most part, to be
> a user list and as such a womaven-dev list would allow us to nut out
> the details (and relevant dev decisions/discussions can be easily
> found in its archive) and then this list can remain useful for user-
> related questions on using the tools.
>
> Thoughts? Andrus tells me that its no trouble for him to set up
> another list...
>
>> On 23/09/2008, at 12:49 AM, Henrique Prange wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've talked with Daryl and Lachlan about plans for WebObjects/
>>> Maven integration for a while. We think is time to open the
>>> discussion for the the entire community.
>>>
>>> We have some doubts about how to proceed. Should we use woproject-
>>> dev list for WO/Maven discussion? Or should we ask Andrus to
>>> create a separate mailing list (i.e. womaven-dev)?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Henrique
>
> with regards,
> --
>
> Lachlan Deck
with regards,
--Lachlan Deck
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 23 2008 - 18:30:55 EDT