Lachlan Deck wrote:
> Okay, looks like there's some kind of consensus with these few replies
> for woproject-dev.
>
> However, it does seem that it's mostly for keeping informed about what's
> happening. So are there any objections to us setting up womaven-dev
> anyway (rather than relying on subject prefixes) and having all messages
> cc'd to woproject-dev to fulfil that interest?
+1.
I was afraid of separate lists in the beginning. But this approach keep
woproject-dev subscribers up to date and make the search process easier.
Cheers,
Henrique
>
> On 23/09/2008, at 7:26 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
>
>> On 23/09/2008, at 1:00 AM, Q wrote:
>>
>>> I think this list is fine. While I may have no immediate plans to use
>>> maven, I am still interested in hearing what's going on with it.
>>
>> My only thinking was that this list seems, for the most part, to be a
>> user list and as such a womaven-dev list would allow us to nut out the
>> details (and relevant dev decisions/discussions can be easily found in
>> its archive) and then this list can remain useful for user-related
>> questions on using the tools.
>>
>> Thoughts? Andrus tells me that its no trouble for him to set up
>> another list...
>>
>>> On 23/09/2008, at 12:49 AM, Henrique Prange wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I've talked with Daryl and Lachlan about plans for WebObjects/Maven
>>>> integration for a while. We think is time to open the discussion for
>>>> the the entire community.
>>>>
>>>> We have some doubts about how to proceed. Should we use
>>>> woproject-dev list for WO/Maven discussion? Or should we ask Andrus
>>>> to create a separate mailing list (i.e. womaven-dev)?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Henrique
>>
>> with regards,
>> --
>>
>> Lachlan Deck
>
> with regards,
> --
>
> Lachlan Deck
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Sep 24 2008 - 12:52:49 EDT