On Nov 10, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>> I don't want to create problems neither for you nor for WO users.
>>> And I'm not saying using those tools will be the best way. But I
>>> still think it is worth evaluating existing solutions. "Forcing"
>>> people to use a tool is not evil if we provide good reasons (and
>>> good integration). Someone chose Eclipse as IDE, Ant as the build
>>> tool, Java as programming language.. And nobody is complain about
>>> those decisions.
>>
>> Actually... I recall a LOT of complaints about all three of those
>> decisions.
> His overall point is still valid, though, which is that the decision
> to go with Eclipse, for instance, is something that requires
> enormous initial complexity for users, but was made based on a
> belief that it would be better for the users. Though this is only
> half right, it's really that I hate Eclipse, but the only other
> reasonable choice is NetBeans, and I hate that even more. This is
> basically the case of Ant, also. Actually I mostly hate
> everything ... Thanks for ruining my day :)
"Everything sucks"
-- Miguel Arroz
-- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP DevelopmentPractical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Nov 10 2008 - 18:52:28 EST