Hi Kieran
Am 07.01.2009 um 13:47 schrieb Kieran Kelleher:
> As long as you are using WOnder's WOOgnl, you can mix both styles.
> In fact, IIRC, Mike Schrag mentioned in the past that he tends to
> use inline style when there are just a few, perhaps 3 or less
> bindings, since it gets unwieldy and difficult to read with a lot of
> bindings. For lots of bindings, the WOD entry is definitely easier
> to work with. I find that mixing the styles and using whichever
> feels more natural for the specific WOComponent that you are binding
> up works well.
Yes you are right. But I like the idea to drop WOD files completely
having only one text file with all information that could be stored
easily as a string in a database.
jw
> For example, I usually use inline style for simple items like
> WOString, WOForm, WOConditional, etc, but for an
> ERXToManyRelationship or some of the versatile Ajax components that
> have a lot of binding options, I find the WOD is easier to work with.
>
> Also WOD is useful if you have something like a RolePrivilege type
> conditional with maybe one or two bindings that is used repeatedly
> in the HTML and need only be defined once in the WOD.
>
> Just my 2 cents :-)
>
> Kieran
>
> On Jan 7, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
>
>> Funny you should mention this... I have also just begun using 'in
>> line' bindings and finding the same problem... it has been fueling
>> the thoughts to return to the WOD.
>>
>> Ted
>>
>> --- On Wed, 1/7/09, Johann Werner <j..yosys.de> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Johann Werner <j..yosys.de>
>>> Subject: Component editor and soft wrap?
>>> To: woproject-de..bjectstyle.org
>>> Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 5:11 AM
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I really like the WO inline binding feature but in the
>>> course of changing all my components to use this I have some
>>> WO tags that have quite a bunch of bindings and thus my
>>> lines can get pretty long. It would be really helpful if the
>>> component editor had an option to soft wrap the content so
>>> all of these lines would still be visible. I don't know if
>>> it is possible to implement that in WOLips or if the editor
>>> is an Ecplise thing.
>>>
>>> jw
>>
>>
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jan 07 2009 - 08:56:12 EST