Bill and Michael's stuff could help. However, there does not seem to
be a clean, reliable solution at the moment.
Should we lobby for a supported, documented, all-encompassing API for
wotaskd through the bug reporter? Or is there a particular reason why
this is not exposed to start with?
Thanks,
F
On Feb 19, 2009, at 11:19, Bill Michell wrote:
> 2009/2/19 Stamenkovic Florijan <flor38..ac.com>
> Also, is anyone doing this?
>
> Yes. You can use methods in the implementation of WOMonitor to
> control the WOtaskd instances, but it is not supported, not
> documented, and it is messy, particularly when it comes to managing
> instances with Auto-recover enabled.
>
> We've hacked together something we use internally, but it isn't code
> I'd be happy spreading around.
>
> --
> bill.michel..ooglemail.com
> bil..ics.org.uk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 19 2009 - 10:33:36 EST