On 24/02/2009, at 2:53 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2009, at 8:37 PM, Q wrote:
>
>>
>> On 24/02/2009, at 9:26 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
>>
>>> On 24/02/2009, at 9:27 AM, Q wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 24/02/2009, at 2:16 AM, John Huss wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 for simplicity.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it be possible have a default value for "package" which is
>>>>> the same package as Main.java?
>>>>
>>>> From memory the current wizard might already do this, and is also
>>>> slightly smarter than that again. It should default the package
>>>> to the package of the component that was selected before you ran
>>>> new wocomponent, failing that, if you selected a folder I think
>>>> it actually looks in the folder and uses the same package as the
>>>> first wo component it finds in there. So when organising
>>>> components into folders and corresponding packages the first one
>>>> you create in a new folder may not have the desired package as
>>>> the default, but every one after that should.
>>>
>>> Now auto-populating the package... (some extra tweaking will come)
>>
>>
>> Looking better. Here are a few thoughts using mike's red pen:
>>
>> <Picture 5.jpg>
>>
>> - There is no validation failure reason for not being able to click
>> finish.
>> - Providing a no content option in the doctype combo could possibly
>> eliminate the need for the doctype checkbox.
>
> Are you thinking of using this for templates? e.g. No Content, Full
> Page, My Custom Template etc?
Yes, that's exactly what I was thinking of as the end game. Although
until we have custom templates it's probably going to be limited to
just selecting a doctype.
>> - Remove the WOO checkbox, if you can't change it you don't need to
>> show it.
>> - Remove the API checkbox, this is pretty useless without custom
>> templates, it would otherwise be empty, and it's created on demand
>> anyway.
>> - The encoding combo can probably shrink down a bit now after
>> dropping the NSOverlyVerboseObjectiveCEncodingNames.
>> - Package textbox is shorter? Is this the max length java allows?
>> Why not the same length as superclass?
>> - How many people are honestly going to need or use interfaces with
>> a wocomponent, ever? Regular java classes I use them often, but
>> never for wocomponents.
>
>
> I do use them, though not as often as with other classes. I am
> quite happy to see this interface picker go away.
>
> Looking good!
>
>
> Chuck
-- Seeya...QQuinton Dolan - qdola..mail.com Gold Coast, QLD, Australia (GMT+10) Ph: +61 419 729 806
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Feb 24 2009 - 00:15:01 EST