Thanks Mike.
Where do you change what layout you want to use?
Ken
On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> FBL:
> project
> Sources
> com/whatever/YourClass.java
> Components (flattens)
> .../.../YourComponent.wo
> WebServerResources (does not flatten)
> .../.../images/whatever.png
> Resources (does not flatten and cannot have subfolders)
> Properties
>
> Maven (don't recall flattening rules, but I suspect it's the
> same ... Henrique, I think, commented on this a couple days ago):
> project
> src
> main
> components
> YourComponent.wo
> java
> com/whatever/YourClass.java
> resources
> Properties
> webserverresources
> image.png
> test
> same as above but for testing things
>
> The main thing both layouts have in common is that they define a
> specific folder structure for finding the parts of your WO project.
> If you conform to the standard, things work better. Maven has the
> additional layer that it splits "test" and "main" aspects of your
> project, so you could have components that are used for testing,
> source only used for testing, and models only used for testing.
> WOLips doesn't play very nicely with this separation just yet, but
> it will.
>
> I use FBL because Wonder used FBL and WOLips "grew up" around FBL.
> The Maven layout will continue to be supported better because there
> are several dedicated Maven WOLips users, but also because Apple
> uses Maven and recommends using it. The choice is mostly up to you,
> though.
>
> ms
>
> On Apr 8, 2009, at 6:54 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> We're going to be moving to a new subversion repository, and for a
>> number of reasons, we've decided to keep the history in the old one
>> and start fresh. This gives me a wonderful opportunity to unify
>> the project structures across all the frameworks and apps.
>>
>> The big question is, where can I find more info on all the
>> different layouts? I hear a lot about fluffy bunnies, but I can't
>> find any doc explaining the pros/cons of different structures, or
>> even what's available. Any help?
>>
>> We have a number of frameworks and apps, very EOF intensive, not
>> using Wonder yet, but would like to. We deploy as wars. Still WO
>> 5.3 and Eclipse 3.3, but would also use this as an opportunity to
>> move to Eclipse 3.4. Any thoughts are appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ken
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Apr 08 2009 - 22:39:33 EDT