Re: eclipse

From: Mike Schrag (mschra..dimension.com)
Date: Thu Sep 03 2009 - 07:20:17 EDT

  • Next message: Mike Schrag: "Re: fyi"

    They haven't fixed the main performance problem, though.

    I really don't recommend 3.5 for people who aren't comfortable with
    Eclipse already -- you should be on the stable build on Eclipse 3.4.

    On Sep 2, 2009, at 7:25 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:

    > On 01/09/2009, at 1:42 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
    >
    >>> for some reason I cAn never seem to get my stuff on the list
    >>> ols tell me where to send and I will.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> what about 3.6?
    >> 3.5 is only at a .0 release ... 3.6 is nowhere near something you
    >> want to use. I have no idea if WOLips is compatible, or if they've
    >> fix the performance problems.
    >
    > 3.5RC1 is better memory/perforamce-wise anecdotally (the cocoa/64-
    > bit one I mean). After waking my computer up from sleep I just
    > restart the workspace and it seems quite happy. But I've not
    > bothered to compared it with the other options.
    >
    > with regards,
    > --
    >
    > Lachlan Deck
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Sep 03 2009 - 07:53:21 EDT