Re: maclike vs eclipselike

From: Pascal Robert (prober..acti.ca)
Date: Sat Oct 03 2009 - 15:53:20 EDT

  • Next message: Henrique Prange: "Re: maclike vs eclipselike"

    Le 09-10-03 à 15:38, Mike Schrag a écrit :

    > I've been thinking some of the same things ... I've been giving a
    > lot of thought about Eclipse-as-a-service -- making a cocoa app that
    > uses the parts of Eclipse that are great (like its understanding and
    > handling of Java) but replacing the parts of it that sucks (like ...
    > everything else). It can be done in lots of ways -- either by having
    > Eclipse as the centerpoint, but only for Java editing, and it vends
    > out a service interface to the project; or, I could embed a VM in a
    > Cocoa app and call between them as needed (this is surprisingly easy
    > to do and actually works really well). As far as cross-platform ...
    > I don't really care about it. I'm not proposing killing WOLips or
    > anything dramatic like that -- it is what it is, I'm just thinking
    > about what tools I want to use to build apps ...

    Well, from what I see, a lot of place are now asking new devs on which
    platform they want to develop, it's not uncommon to see PHP and RoR
    teams with people on OS X, Windows and Linux. I don't think doing a
    Mac only app is the way to go. BTW, from the survey :
            Which platforms are used at your organization/department to DEVELOP
    with WebObjects?

            Mac OS X 92 orgs
            Windows 16 orgs
            Linux 6 orgs
            Other 2 orgs

    Personally, I would prefer a RCP-based IDE (like Flex Builder and
    Aptana) and some Mac specific fixes like Maclipse provides + having
    the component editor window as a second window so that we can see the
    component and the Java code at the same time, and it would allow
    people to see the binding view without having to buy a 30" screen.

    > Don't read too much into this at this point. I've just been thinking
    > about it for a while.
    >
    >> Eclipse's UI and behaviour will always be one of love/hate with
    >> people - 'cause it aims to do everything cross-platform etc. It's
    >> also bloated with so many plugins, some of which work well, some
    >> badly that it'll never feel like it's out of beta nor natural (as
    >> you say). I don't see this changing in big ways unless there's a
    >> radical change tool-wise, though to do so may sacrifice cross-
    >> platform options which are always the lowest common denominator.
    >> e.g., consider a webkit or IB plugin or something for editing non-
    >> java stuff.
    >>
    >> I wonder what the workflow would be like if things returned
    >> somewhat towards the way things used to be (with dedicated apps for
    >> view/model editing)... but in a new way... perhaps as a webkit or
    >> IB plugin or something. Then you could drop eclipse's bloat where
    >> it's not needed and perhaps tailor the experience more easily etc
    >> and perhaps move towards the whole experience being more visually
    >> driven which could potentially have some RAD benefits (ala rails).
    >> With a language like groovy backing things the whole experience
    >> could be very dynamic.
    >>
    >> Just thought I'd throw that out there seeing as you're thinking
    >> outside the box.. And hey, you've gotta have a reason for putting
    >> Gianduia to good use somewhere right? It'll surely need a good UI ;-)
    >>
    >>> Anyway ... I'm not sold on this, but Eclipse UI is the suck, so
    >>> I'm always looking a ways we can make it suck less.
    >>
    >> Cool.
    >>
    >> with regards,
    >> --
    >>
    >> Lachlan Deck
    >>
    >
    >

    -------------------------------------------------------
    Pascal Robert

    Twitter | AIM/iChat : MacTICanada



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Oct 03 2009 - 15:54:57 EDT