Re: Eclipse 3.5

From: David LeBer (dleber_wode..odeferous.com)
Date: Fri Dec 18 2009 - 20:54:19 EST

Next message: Andrew Lindesay: "Re: Eclipse 3.5"

Previous message: Jeremy Matthews: "Re: Eclipse 3.5"
In reply to: Chuck Hill: "Re: Eclipse 3.5"
Next in thread: Miguel Arroz: "Re: Eclipse 3.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2009-12-18, at 8:19 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:

> I think that most are still on 3.4. I know that I still am. But New Hotness IS in the 3.4 stable release. Life without New Hotness is not worth living.
>
> Chuck
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Jeremy Matthews wrote:
>
>> Is everyone still using Eclipse 3.4.2/WOLips 3.4.xxxx, or has the general public moved to the 3.5.1+new hotness?
>>
>> -j

To clarify, "New Hotness" has a specific meaning when it comes to WOLips as it is the name given to the revised classpath handling code - which *is* in Stable.

I have a copy of 3.5 + bleeding-edginess installed, but spend most of my time in 3.4 + Stable.

;david

--
David LeBer
Codeferous Software
'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing'
site: 	http://codeferous.com
blog: 	http://davidleber.net
profile:	http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber
twitter:	http://twitter.com/rebeld
--
Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group:
http://tacow.org

Next message: Andrew Lindesay: "Re: Eclipse 3.5"
Previous message: Jeremy Matthews: "Re: Eclipse 3.5"
In reply to: Chuck Hill: "Re: Eclipse 3.5"
Next in thread: Miguel Arroz: "Re: Eclipse 3.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Dec 18 2009 - 20:54:57 EST