Hello Entity Modeler Users
A happy new year and a successful personal and business year to all of you!
I would like to come back to the discussion about the (missing) diagram view in Entity Modeler. And thank to all who gave some help, even with software to use in conjunction with OmniGraffle.
It seems I have to accept that there is noone in the development team having lust to implement such a view. I also of course accept that some or many developers don't use it or look at it as something superfluous.
But we still need such a diagram view here (and yes we print it out as well - sorry for that old fashioned style .-) so I would like to ask again about the possibilities to create such a diagram. As far as I understood it (and there is always a chance I missed something as english is not my mother tongue) the given help was sort of quick help for now.
My requirements would be:
- Get somehow a diagram view out of the Entity Modeler (or within the Entity Modeler :-)) for example in OmniGraffle format
- I am willing to arrange the entities manually the first time
- At the second, third, ... export the entities should stay at the same place, so there is no need to position the entities at every export
Am I dreaming?
Is anybody willing to share her/his checklist how to accomplish the above?
Thanks, Robert
On 03.12.2009, at 19:10, David Avendasora wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:28 AM, Joe Little wrote:
>
>> but but.. how does one end of the wire connect to the other end of the
>> wire? I'm confused :)
>
> What's really unclear to me is if the relationship from 1 to 2 is mandatory.
>
> Dave
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:32 AM, David Avendasora
>> <webobject..vendasora.com> wrote:
>>> Oh come on, how can you not find diagrams useful! I mean really - this diagram http://www.msarnoff.org/chipdb/WIRE really clears up a lot of my confusion on the matter.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> On Dec 3, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>>
>>>> oh .. ha. yeah the unclear antecedent of "them" COMPLETELY changes the meaning of that sentence :) "them" = "diagram views" not "the people requesting the views".
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 3, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> He was referring to the view type, not the people requesting it... (I think :P)
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Anjo
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 03.12.2009 um 14:46 schrieb Jean Pierre Malrieu:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 3 déc. 09 à 13:55, mschra..dimension.com a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The conclusion from my perspective was that there have only been a couple people who have ever asked for this view, and given that I don't even like them,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you trying to imitate Anjo's inimitable outspokenness?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JPM
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> David Avendasora
>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>> K12, Inc.
>>>
>>> *****
>>> WebObjects Documentation Wiki : http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/
>>> *****
>>> WebObjects API: http://developer.apple.com/legacy/mac/library/documentation/MacOSXServer/Reference/WO54_Reference/index.html
>>> *****
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> David Avendasora
> Senior Software Engineer
> K12, Inc.
>
> *****
> WebObjects Documentation Wiki : http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/
> *****
> WebObjects API: http://developer.apple.com/legacy/mac/library/documentation/MacOSXServer/Reference/WO54_Reference/index.html
> *****
>
>
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ r. huber
_/
_/ _/ _/ 7r gmbh
_/ _/ _/ alpenstrasse 93
_/ _// ch-8200 schaffhausen
_/ _/
_/ _/ tel. +41 52 624 81 15 www.seven-r.ch
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Jan 12 2010 - 05:47:15 EST