Re: Reason(s) for not using the WOBuilder anymore

From: mschra..dimension.com
Date: Fri Jan 15 2010 - 07:12:30 EST

  • Next message: Susanne Schneider: "Re: Reason(s) for not using the WOBuilder anymore"

    If it works for you, use it... Know that you're hanging by a thread,
    though.

    Sent from my iPhone

    On Jan 15, 2010, at 6:54 AM, "Andri
    vonAllmen"<Andri.vonAllme..edes.com> wrote:

    > Hi List,
    >
    > while porting some WebObjects Applications (from the WO IDE to
    > Eclipse,
    > everything on a Windows operating system), I encountered the
    > WOBuilder
    > issue
    > (http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/Using+WOBuilder+with+WOLips
    > ).
    >
    > Because I could not detect any lack of functionality or other problems
    > when using the WOBuilder from within Eclipse, the question arised, if
    > there might be some points, arguing against the usage of WOBuilder,
    > that
    > I'm missing?
    >
    > I'm aware, that the WOBuilder is not running on fruity operating
    > systems without the Cocoa-Java bridge anymore, and that it would not
    > be
    > a big thing to work without the WOBuilder, I just wondered about the
    > reasons for the general conclusion to not use this tool anymore.
    >
    >
    > --- Disclaimer:
    > --------------------------------------------------------- This email
    > and
    > contents is for use only by the intended recipient. If you are not the
    > individual or entity to whom it is addressed, you are hereby formally
    > notified that any use, copying or distribution of this email and
    > attachments, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have
    > received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete the
    > message and attachment(s) from your system. Any views, opinions or
    > information, expressed or contained in this email, are those of the
    > sender and not necessarily reflect those of CEDES. To help protect our
    > environment, please avoid printing out this information unnecessarily.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jan 15 2010 - 07:13:13 EST