Re: Questions to new WonderEntity templates

From: Lachlan Deck (lachlan.dec..mail.com)
Date: Fri Jul 02 2010 - 16:08:24 UTC

  • Next message: Ramsey Lee Gurley: "Re: Questions to new WonderEntity templates"

    On 03/07/2010, at 1:17 AM, David Avendasora wrote:

    > On Jul 2, 2010, at 11:10 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
    >
    >> On 03/07/2010, at 1:00 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
    >>
    >>> No big harm. I just hate having red-circles-with-xes show up when I update, and QA would kill me if I modified almost every class in our core frameworks right now.
    >>
    >> Wouldn't it make sense, in that case, to have your own templates defined (even if just a copy of the default ones) and only update them as needed [or allowed] from the default ones?
    >
    > Yes, but then should I also have my own copy of the Wonder frameworks themselves and then manually merge in only the changes I want?

    Quite a different question. The templates define what happens to 'your' source code.

    > I think that the same rules that are followed for the classes should be followed for the templates, since the generate classes.

    We beg to differ :)

    with regards,

    --
    

    Lachlan Deck



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jul 02 2010 - 16:09:25 UTC