Makes sense. It's fine with me.
Andrus
>> On Jan 19, 2005, at 2:40 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>> > Is there a reason why a MODIFIED object couldn't be copied into a
>> new context?
>> > I've never had the need to do it, but I don't see why it would be
>> disallowed.
>
> Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>> I agree - current behavior (throwing an exception) is probably not the
>> best solution... I am in favor of changing that... The question is -
>> do we want to copy a changed object, or a committed version of it? To
>> be on a safe side, I'd say committed (but maybe there are valid cases
>> for copying the changes as well?)
>
> I would say that the modified values should be copied.
> That would be the behavior end-users expect. It was the behavior that
> Andre expected.
>
> -Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jan 20 2005 - 14:42:09 EST