Ulrich,
It was built with 1.0.1. Once I built the project file manually, it 
stayed in synch when I created a new component. I would guess that my 
foray into ProjectBuilderWO somehow prevented an update when I added 
a component ealier. I did create the component in WOLips.
Looks as if as long as our programmers don't build with both PBWO and 
WOLips, the project file should automatically stay in synch.
-- Paul
At 9:25 AM +0200 5/8/03, Ulrich K�ster wrote:
>Hi Paul,
>
>in 1.0.1 the PB.project should stay in sync with the project. Is 
>this with 1.0.1?
>
>Ulrich
>
>Am Mittwoch, 07.05.03 um 22:55 Uhr schrieb Paul Hertz:
>
>>Okay, scratch most of this question ;-P. I just discovered the 
>>Project Context Menu. Always happens right after i post a 
>>question--some corollary to Murphy's Law: "The anwer becomes 
>>obvious once you get up the courage to ask the experts."
>>
>>The one thing that worries me in rebuilding PB.project manually is 
>>that files may get saved to CVS for Win developers to download, but 
>>the Mac user who saved them has forgotten to rebuild PB.project.
>>
>>-- Paul
>>
>>At 3:27 PM -0500 5/7/03, Paul Hertz wrote:
>>>Cross-platform work with WO5.2 Win is the main reason I'm using Mac Eclipse.
>>>
>>>Maybe I'm missing something here. When I added a .wo file with 
>>>WOLips, it did dutifully create the .java and .api and other 
>>>files, but it did not update PB.project. ISTR it did update 
>>>PB.project when I created the Main.wo file in creating the project.
>>>
>>>So, I'm maintaining the PB.project file by opening 
>>>ProjectBuilderWO and adding the files.
>>>
>>>If I understand the WOProject documentation correctly, I ought to 
>>>be able to do rebuild PB.project with PBIndex. Couldn't I add a 
>>>script similar to the one on the documentation page to my 
>>>build.xml file and execute it whenever I needed to update? Better 
>>>yet, couldn't I make that update part of the build?
>>>
>>>OTOH, in future versions will PB.project eventually get updated 
>>>whenever I add files to my project? This would seem to be the 
>>>simplest way to do things. But, as I said, I may have missed 
>>>something.
>>>
>>>-- Paul
>>
>>
>>--
>>Paul Hertz <paul-hert..orthwestern.edu> 
>>|(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)|
>>              <http://www.northwestern.edu/people/paul-hertz>
-- 
Paul Hertz <paul-hert..orthwestern.edu> 
|(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)|
              <http://www.northwestern.edu/people/paul-hertz>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed May 14 2003 - 13:20:50 EDT