I'm on OS X, not Windows, but I'm seeing the same thing here. I'm
running Eclipse M6 currently with WOLips 2.0.0.115 and there are all
sorts of little things not working like:
- Eclipse doesn't remember prefs settings like the default workspace
- Right-clicking on a project and selecting WOLips --> Install
doesn't work, have to choose Install... and select the project and
that seems to work
- WOLips related view doesn't work, always empty
I'm going to try Eclipse RC2 and latest build of WOLips tonight to
see if that makes any difference.
Cheers,
H�r�ur �.
Lausn hugb�na�ur ehf
Tel. +354-534-5005 / +354-699-1068
Web: http://www.lausn.is
On 2.5.2006, at 14:03, Anjo Krank wrote:
> Well... I don't know if I should be happy that I'm not just
> imagining things or alarmed because this was also my impression.
> I'll also try RC2 today.
>
> How about our Windows brethren? Does Eclipse/WOLips work ok for you?
>
> Cheers, Anjo
>
> Am 02.05.2006 um 15:47 schrieb Mike Schrag:
>
>> Yes .. I was thinking this just this morning. I can't tell if
>> this is that Eclipse >M5 sucks or Eclipse >M5 is not as compatible
>> with WOLips. It's driving me crazy at the moment. I just
>> downloaded RC2 to see if these problems go away. They have been
>> steadily getting WORSE with each of these milestone releases the
>> past couple. It's making me nervous about the final release of
>> 3.2. I was planning on spending some time today getting back into
>> WOlips world to see if I could troubleshoot.
>>
>> On May 2, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> is it just me or are all Eclipse builds > M5 pretty rough to use?
>>> Breakpoints don't display correctly, copy/paste sometimes doesn't
>>> work, installing WOLips isn't very straightforward anymore etc.
>>>
>>> I wonder how much of this is due to WOLips and how much due to
>>> Eclipse proper and the dependencies. Can we expect a smoother
>>> version once Eclipse 3.2 final ships? Any ideas or estimates?
>>>
>>> Cheers, Anjo
>>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue May 02 2006 - 10:19:53 EDT