Yep; its less of a question of whether or not people want it as it is
a question of becoming a profitable exercise..
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:16 PM, Mike Schrag <mschra..dimension.com> wrote:
> I've never argued against the concept of WOBuilder. I've said that
> I think the implementation is pretty useless for modern CSS-based
> site design (which makes sense given the year WOB was written).
> I've also said that even duplicating what it does NOW is nontrivial
> and a substantial investment of time. That nobody has written a
> suitable replacement yet should tell us something more than people
> asking for one does :)
>
> ms
>
> On Oct 4, 2007, at 9:53 PM, Jeremy Matthews wrote:
>
>> Funny how we keep looking for a WOBuilder replacement...even if
>> just a pseudo-inline viewer and not an editor.
>>
>> That alone should really tell us something....
>>
>> -j
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Oct 05 2007 - 12:26:26 EDT