Re: Unit test coverage

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..laska.net)
Date: Sat May 07 2005 - 15:11:13 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Updating dependent libs"

    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Holger_Hoffst=E4tte?= <holge..izards.de> wrote:
    > As far as I can tell there's currently no coverage overview for the test
    > suite, right? Would this be a welcome addition? For quite some time most
    > of the freely available coverage tools used to be rather limited, broken
    > or unwieldy to use, but recently emma (http://emma.sourceforge.net/) and
    > cobertura (http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/) - a spin-off from the
    > commercial jcoverage - became available and look pretty good. There's a
    > nice article about cobertura here:

    I've been using emma on my projects for almost a year now, and I think it's
    great.
    I only wish there were a junitemma ant task for it along with the javaccemma
    task.

    -Mike



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat May 07 2005 - 15:09:20 EDT